Wednesday, 11/15/17
Vatican II is fifty years
behind us, but some of its highlights are still bright. Like we are still effected by what happened on November 14, 1963.
Up to that day it was easy to know the Church's stand on any question. We'd say,
"Our Church says . . "
We knew the pope was
infallible, and that he shared that gift with that cardinal who was the Prefect
of the Holy Office. Since 1957 that post had been held by Cardinal Alfredo Octavian,
and we knew of cases where he had silenced theologians who had differed from
him.
Now, Pope John in 1960 had
appointed the several cardinal prefects of the Curia to oversee the composition
of the sixteen schema that summarized our Church's position in the areas chosen
for the Council's consideration.
In line with that procedure, Cardinal
Ottaviani, as Prefect of the Holy Office, was given the task of assembling a
team of bishops and scholars to compose a schema explaining how the Church had
always seen the gift off Divine Revelation that was entrusted to her.
On that fourteenth of
November Cardinal Ottaviani had another
bishop read the schema his team had prepared for explaining Divine Revelation,
but he spoke first, assuring the Cardinals and bishops that what they were
about to hear was the Church's indisputable teaching on the substance of
Revelation.
The team's first chapter of
their schema led off by stating that, with the Church's Magisterium empowered
to decide on questionable questions, both the Church's Tradition and the Scriptures
are the purveyors of Divine Revelation.
With the floor open for
comments, one cardinal after another rejected Ottaviani's assertion that church tradition could be seen
as divinely inspired. I was pleased with my St. Louis's Cardinal Ritter
suggesting that the whole of Ottaviani's schema be discarded.
With the Church's cardinals expressing
various understanding of our Faith, I felt empowered to do the same. St. Anselm
had defined theology as Faith seeking understanding, I felt we can be theologians,
seeking understanding our Faith.
No comments:
Post a Comment