12/28/11
In Chapter Two of his Gospel
Luke described how when the child Jesus was forty days old Joseph and Mary
brought him to the temple where he was recognized by Simeon and Anna. Luke
followed that by relating, “When they had fulfilled all the prescriptions of
the law of the Lord, they returned to Galilee, to their own town of Nazareth.”
If it happened that way it
could not have happened the way Matthew described it. He told us that the Holy
Family remained in Bethlehem for up to two years before they went down to
Egypt, staying there for years, then going to settle in Nazareth for the first
time.
This is a hard, but
necessary, thing for people to grasp: the incidents related in Bible stories
are often not factual. Though not factual, they are true in that they convey
true concepts. When Matthew and Luke sat down to write their Gospels they
settled on the stories going around that backed up the message they were
writing their gospels to teach.
The story of the massacre of
the babies in Bethlehem cannot be fitted into Luke’s Gospel; and, there
is a good chance it never happened. The Jewish historian for those years, a man
named Josephus, didn’t approve of Herod, and he wrote about all the heartless
things King Herod did; but he makes no mention of such a massacre.
The story of the
slaughtering of the Innocents is there to turn our attention and pity to such
children as those who are victims to AIDs, Cholera, and starvation. That is
what this feast is meant for. It should make us protectors of today’s innocent
ones.
No comments:
Post a Comment